![]() ![]() ![]() These feelings – which I call feelings of vitality or vital feelings – constitute the main concern of this paper. ( shrink)Ī very basic form of experience consists in feeling energetic, vital, alive, tired, dispirited, vigorous and so on. Approaching testimony as the collaborative process of enabling an understanding to be articulated can enhance our conception of gendered violence, whilst also better serving the victims of gendered violence by helping to overcome the lack of trust and excessive scepticism with which victims’ testimony is often met. It is argued that testimony must be considered as a relational whole, and thus our aim in receiving victims’ testimony should be to honour the relational conditions under which the truth of testimony can be heard. This account is deepened in the discussion of testimony as a communicative act. The embodiment of meaning suggests testimony should not be approached as an assertion, but as a process of (. Affect indicates how scepticism may arise through the social moods that often attune agents to victims’ testimony. Guided by the concept of ‘disclosedness’, a tripartite analysis of testimony as an affective, embodied, communicative act is developed. This paper explores a way to address this problem by developing a phenomenological approach to testimony. ( shrink)ĪBSTRACT Testimony from victims of gendered violence is often wrongly disbelieved. I call this the “subjective salience desideratum.” In the bulk of the paper, I articulate and motivate the desideratum, show that extant theories of moods do not satisfy it, and offer a preliminary overview of possible (yet unexplored) theories that have the subjective salience desideratum at their core. I argue that any adequate theory of moods should account for this fact. ) overlooked by most participants in the debate: the fact that moods involve a particularly marked salience of the subjective aspect of experience. In this paper, I want to draw attention to a different feature of moods, one that is as important and in need of explanation as their apparent undirectedness, but which has been (. The philosophical debate around the nature of moods has mostly focused on their apparent undirectedness: unlike mental states such as perceptual experiences, thoughts, and emotions, moods do not seem to be directed at any specific object, and indeed they do not seem to be directed at anything at all. Finally, the paper explores the model’s prospective applications on the study of animal affect-related decision-making under predation risk and its potential to unlock new methods for improving animal welfare. To do so, this paper engages with the theoretical and methodological challenges surrounding the incorporation of a third dimension in the definition of core affect, advocates for a definition of dominance as a measure of self-assessed behavioural control and, on such basis, proposes the ‘Valence-Arousal-Dominance’ model of affect. This complexity prompts a compelling case for the (re-)integration of dominance as a dimension of affect –a conative dimension that offers a more nuanced framework for explicating the affective responses of animals. In settings that are closer to ecologically relevant situations, animals routinely encounter a diverse array of stimuli, some of which elude neat categorization as purely rewarding or punishing. ) valence with punishments, imposes questionable constraints on such task. However, standard reliance on valence-arousal models, where positive valence aligns with rewards and negative (. Within this context, functional operationalization stands as a powerful tool in guiding researchers’ quest to construct cross-species measures and tractable hypotheses concerning the stimuli that trigger these states and the ensuing responses they elicit. This paper contributes to this interdisciplinary endeavour by examining theoretical assumptions underlying the experimental study of animal affective states. The study of affective states increasingly demands the integration of philosophical and experimental research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |